# faster than module or as FastCGI?

**URL:** https://forum.shopware.com/t/faster-than-module-or-as-fastcgi/61644
**Category:** Installation/Einstieg
**Created:** [9. September 2019 um 15:29 UTC](https://forum.shopware.com/t/faster-than-module-or-as-fastcgi/61644 "2019-09-09T15:29:09Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![iosman123](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e56c9b/32.png) [@iosman123](https://forum.shopware.com/u/iosman123)
#### Post date: [14. September 2019 um 13:10 UTC](https://forum.shopware.com/t/faster-than-module-or-as-fastcgi/61644/3 "2019-09-14T13:10:26Z")

</div>

> [@iosman123 schrieb:](https://forum.shopware.com/profile/32069/iosman123 "iosman123")
> 
> Hello,
> 
> &nbsp;
> 
> I have a hosting package at [Allinkl.com](http://Allinkl.com).&nbsp;On the server PHP runs in version 5.5 as a module.&nbsp;Other versions can be addressed via htaccess.
> 
> There is a module as a performer.&nbsp;In the net, however, I found this contradictory.
> 
> So what’s faster: module or FastCGI?
> 
> What would you guess what to use?&nbsp;There is apparently also the problem with use as a module that I have to give the file ownership to the PHP user (www-data), so Shopware file operations (media upload) can do.&nbsp;But then I have no access via FTP?
> 
> &nbsp;
> 
> thanks[,](http://https://solutionforwindows.com)
> 
> iosman
> 
> &nbsp;
> 
> thanks my issue has been fixed.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.shopware.com/t/faster-than-module-or-as-fastcgi/61644)._